Free Essays

Free Email Featured by Free Essays:
YourEmail@v.gg
Email Login
Password

New Users Sign Up for an Email Account!

Premium Email
Art History Essays Classical Studies Essays English Essays Political Science Essays Psychology Essays Custom Essays

Free Essays:
Art History

PrimaPorta Augustus vs. Emperor Constantine Narmer's Palette vs. Justinian's Mosaic

Free Essays Ad:

   Free Essays >> Art History Papers >> Free Art History Essays: Narmer's Palette Compared with the Mosaik of Emperor Justinian

Narmer's Palette Compared with the Mosaic of Emperor Justinian

Continued from: Pharaoh Narmer's Palette

As a result of Eastern Roman emperor Justinian's conquering the West, "the richest array of monuments of the First Golden Age (526 - 726 AD)"21 was preserved not in Constantinople but in Ravenna, originally a naval station on the Adriatic, and a capital of the West Roman emperors from 402 AD.

The most important church of that time was San Vitale, built in 526 - 547 AD. Janson characterizes its style as the one deriving mainly from Constantinople22. Justinian put this image inside a very impressive church. Compared to Sta. Costanza, for example, San Vitale is both large in scale and "richer in spatial effect"23.

The central mosaic is in the apse of San Vitale. It shows Christ seated on a globe surrounded by two angels and is passing a golden crown to Saint Vitalis.

On the two side walls of the apse are mosaics of Justinian and his empress Theodora, accompanied by their retinue and the local clergy, attending the church service "as if this were a palace chapel"24. Emperor Justinian shows his dominance differently from pharaoh Narmer. His figure is also central in the mosaic, but in a different way. His figure is more realistic than the one of the pharaoh. Justinian is the same height as his attendants. He wears the same royal purple as Christ in the apse.

There is a certain spiritual air in this composition. Justinian is portrayed surrounded by his attendants as Jesus had been traditionally portrayed surrounded by his disciples. The gold background of the mosaic eliminates the reality, as if transporting the viewer into a spiritual world25.

On Justinian's left the archbishop Maximian26 (identified by an inscription) wears a gold cloak and holds a jeweled cross. Two more members of the clergy are standing to his left. The archbishop's superiority to the two other members of clergy on his left is obvious from the position of his feet. He, in fact, is the closest figure to us, which shows the dominant position of the priestly class in the Byzantine society at that time. Justinian's, however, balances out his slightly modest place. The halo around his head makes him noticeably taller than anybody else in the mosaic, restoring the most dominant position to the emperor.

On Justinian's right, we can see Justinian's general, Belisarius27. A native of Thrace, just as the emperor28, he brought Justinian great victory both in North Africa and in Italy29. During his lifetime, Belisarius had been the right hand of the emperor, just as he is portrayed in the mosaic30.

In the left corner of the mosaic (the emperor's right), is Justinian's military guard31 with their large green shield decorated with the first letters of the name of Christ in Greek: Chi-Rho. This gives us a definite parallel with the first Christian emperor, Constantine I32.

By having this sign on the shield of his imperial guards, Justinian not only communicates his link with the great, victorious, and supposedly pious emperor of the past, but also shows himself as a "a worthy successor"33. The mosaic served as a visual reminder of the power of the emperor in a place far from his capital and of his "religious devotion to Christ"34.

The shapes of the imperial attendants are so strangely slim and even flat, that it is hard to believe into existence of human bodies under their robes. Janson insists that despite their stylized forms, eyes, brows and noses of the same shape, Justinian, Theodora and their retinue were intended to individual likenesses35. Their ascetic shapes may also be a reflection of the ideal of an austere life led by Justinian and his expectation to do the same of his subordinates36.

We know who the Justinian's attendants are, but not so with Narmer. This is not caused only by the present lack of information about the court of the pharaoh. Even if one got to travel in time and got to know his officials personally, he would not be able to point them on the palette. People surrounding the pharaoh were not meant to be recognizable.

Both Narmer and Justinian are seeking to be god-like. Where Narmer surrounds himself with the Egyptian gods and mixes himself with them, Justinian associates himself with the Son of the Christian God, Jesus Christ. By doing this, Justinian is in fact connecting himself with a force that is much stronger in the minds of his people than the gods of Egypt were in the minds of the ancient Egyptians37.

There are twelve attendants surrounding Justinian, just as there were twelve apostles of Jesus before the betrayal. I spent a considerable amount of time wondering what he meant by having this number of the apostles. Did he try to associate himself with Jesus as a leader before his betrayal? Or with the church going on after the apostles found a replacement for Judas who had committed suicide later38. The answer turned out to be quite simple: the twelfth companion was added later39. Justinian was not meant to see the mosaic and he never did. It was meant to impress the people of the far-away Italy40.

 


Opposite of the Justinian's mosaic, we can see empress Theodora and her retinue. (Fig. 5). She wears the same royal purple as her husband, which shows her to be an obvious match for her imperial husband. Her head is framed by a halo. She offers a golden cup. She is repeating the gesture of the three Magi on her robe offering gifts to Mary and little Jesus41. Adams comments that since Theodora herself is placed farther back in the picture space than Justinian, her image is less imposing42.

 


In our time there have been many books written about Justinian, while it is almost impossible not able to find one specifically on Narmer43. Sadly, we do not have enough information about the pharaoh. We have detailed accounts about Justinian's reign. His life, especially his relationship with his wife, has always aroused public interest. Writing at the time of Predynastic Egypt, however, had for its purpose recording the figures, numbers, and facts, not people's private life, not even the one of the pharaoh. As a result, the information we have about the first pharaoh is very limited. Even though most of the information we have about Justinian comes from only one book, The Secret History by Procopius. We have at least one notable historian, even though a biased one44, who was interested in the life of the imperial couple. The little information we have about Narmer comes mostly from assumptions and theorizing. We do not even know what his name should have really sounded like. It almost feels as a pity that no elaborate details and even gossip about the reign of Narmer made it to our time.

 

 

Essay Writing Services

Essay Writing Service
$16.95 per page
Free essay research, free references,
Free essay revision, free shipment

Admission Essay Help and Editing:
College, business school, graduate
school, law school, health programs,
medical school, and private high schools


 


Free Essays Sponsor:

Bibliography

  1. Adams, Laurie Schneider. Art Across Time. 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2001.
  2. Andreescu-Treadgold, Irina and Warren Tredgold. “Procopius and the Imperial Panels of S. Vitale.” Art Bulletin. 79.4 (December 1997): 708-24.
  3. Barker, Ernest. Social and Political Thoght in Byzantium from Justinian I to the Last Palaeologus: Passages from Byzantine Writers and Documents. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.
  4. Browning, Robert. Justinian and Theodora. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson, 1987.
  5. Centre for Computer Aided Egyptological Research. The Autobiography of Weni the Elder. 2000. Faculty of Theology, Utrecht University. 4 Nov. 2001 .
  6. Clayton, Peter A. Chronicle of the Pharaohs: the Reign-by-Reign Record of the Rulers and Dynasties of Ancient Egypt. New York, NY: Thames & Hudson, 1994.
  7. David, Jacque-Louis. Belisarius. Musée Des Beaux-Arts, Lille. 1781. .
  8. Dollinger, Andre. “The Narmer Palette.” An introduction to the history and culture of Pharaonic Egypt. Jan. 2000. Reshafim. 1 Nov. 2001 .
  9. Egyptian Gods Theme: Hathor. Maintained by Jeff Hayes. 2001. University of Colorado at Boulder. 6 Nov. 2001 .
  10. Eusebius of Caesarea. Life of Constantine. Introduction, translation and commentary by Averil Cameron and Stuart G. Hall. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
  11. The Great Pharaohs of Egypt. Videocassette. New York: A & E Home Video, 1997.
  12. Hail Caesar [VI], Justinian: the last of the Romans. Videocassette. New York: A & E Home Video, 1998.
  13. Herodotus. Histories. Book Two. Translated with Notes by George Rawlinson, with an Introduction by Tom Grifith. Herfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited, 1996.
  14. Hildinger, Erik. “Belisarius’ Bid for Rome.” Military History. 16.4 (October 1991): 30-7.
  15. Janson, H.W. History of Art. Revised and expanded by Antony F. Janson. 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1991.
  16. Kitzinger, Ernst. Byzantine Art in the Making: Main lines of Stylistic Development in Mediterranean Art 3rd – 7th century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977.
  17. McClung Museum. “Ancient Egypt.” Frank H. McClung Museum. 6 Nov. 2001. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 6 Nov. 2001 .
  18. The NIV Study Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1995.
  19. Palette of Narmer. Egyptian Museum, Cairo. ca. 3,100 BC.
  20. Perepelkin,Yuri. Istoria Drevnego Yegipta. Introduction and commentary by A.L. Vassoevich. Moscow: Letniy Sad, 2000.
  21. Procopius. Secret History. Translated by Richard Atwater; foreword by Arthur E.R. Boak. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1961.
  22. Shepherd, Gary K. “While Emperor Justinian I Revived Byzantine Splendor at Home, Count Belisarius Revived Its Power Abroad.” Military History. 14.7 (March 1998): 20-22.
  23. Ure, P.N. Justinian and His Age. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1979.
  24. Vinson, Steve. “Narmer.” Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Donald B. Redford, ed. in chief. 3 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  25. Whitby, L. Michael. “Justinian.” Oxford Classical Dictionary. Eds. Simon Hornblower and Antony Spawforth. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  26. Wright, Mary. “Contacts Between Egypt and Syro-Palestine During the Protodynastic Period.” Biblical Archaeologist. (December 1985): 240-53.
Essays.org.uk: Sample Free Essays & Papers Online

Copyright © 2005 essays.org.uk All Rights Reserved.     Essays.org.uk Privacy Policy